Guy Fawkes tried to blow up Parliament and now, 405 years later, David Cameron has done the job for him. At least no-one was hurt.
The European Court of Human Rights has decreed that prisoners in British jails must be allowed to vote in elections and, six years after that decision, we’ve caved in.
We’re told David Cameron is “exasperated and furious”.
As a response, that’s as pathetic as having to share our armed forces with the French.
As a betrayal, it’s even worse.
The Prime Minister came to power promising to scrap the legislation, imposed by Tony Blair, which created the human rights industry in this country.
Labour signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, something we had resisted doing for decades.
It was originally drawn up to save less happy lands from dictatorship. It aimed to defend the sort of human rights violated by people like Franco in Spain, Mussolini in Italy and, of course, Hitler.
Mercifully, we have never suffered that kind of evil Government so we never had a need for laws which enshrined our basic human rights – we had Magna Carta in 1215 and it served us well enough.
But in their desperation to be “at the heart of Europe”, Tony and his cronies gave us human rights which, in turn, gave every terrorist, murderer and whinger an excuse to take the Government to court at our expense.
Before the General Election, Cameron and Co pledged to scrap the human rights legislation and replace it.
Their plan for a British Bill of Rights would probably have been no great improvement but it was a start.
That plan has now been dropped. Instead, we must admit that British sovereignty no longer exists.
Our Parliament has decreed several times to ensure prisoners can’t vote. Yet one European Court ruling and elected representatives become irrelevant.
Mr Cameron’s decision to cave in proves our Parliament might as well not exist. Our
laws are made by unelected foreign institutions we have no control over. It’s as if we had surrendered to a foreign power.
It is disgusting that prisoners, people who have committed serious crimes, should have a say in choosing how we are governed.
One of the many offensive aspects is that the Government has caved in as a result of a case brought – with Legal Aid, of course – by a mad axe-man.
John Hirst killed his landlady with an axe. He pleaded guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility. He got out of jail after 25 years.
While he was inside, he discovered a desire to vote. Having taken the Government all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, he is out of jail and able to celebrate.
This vile specimen had the effrontery to post a YouTube video where says: “Well, I’ve got the joint, I’m going to celebrate. I’ve got the bottle of champagne and I’m going to celebrate because last night it was announced that prisoners have now got the vote, which I’m really chuffed about.
“I’m now going to celebrate for the 75,000 prisoners who will be getting the vote. That includes murderers, rapists and paedophiles. All of them will be getting the vote because it’s their human right to have the vote.”
Thanks to an assortment of judges, many from some of the farthest-flung corners of Europe where human rights have only just been invented, murderers, rapists and paedophiles may yet decide the course of British politics.
This, in itself, is a staggering betrayal by Mr Cameron. It shows, among other things, that he is the willing victim of his coalition with the Liberal-Democrats.
They, in fairness, actually believe prisoners should be allowed to vote – though they kept pretty quiet about it before the election. They also believe in Britain being run by Europe.
Now they’ve got their way – another case of the Lib-Dem tail wagging the Tory dog.
The people who now make British laws are the European Court judges. Among them are human rights expert Ganna Yudkivska, from the Ukraine; university lecturer Nebojsa Vucinic from Montenegro; and Khanlar Hajivev, president of the supreme court of Azerbaijan.
Did you vote for any of them? No, nor me.
I’m sure they’re all honourable and learned. But what do they know about this country? Indeed, what do they know about democracy and the vote?
David Cameron is guilty not just of the usual politician’s double-dealing. He is guilty of betraying his country.
He has surrendered to a foreign power without the least resistance.
This is not just about whether 70,000 convicts should be allowed to vote. It’s about who runs Britain.
If we concede defeat to the European courts, we can be as “exasperated and furious” as we like but he has submitted to an unelected foreign dictatorship.
The only consolation is that when prisoners do get to vote, even they will realise it’s not worth bothering if our Government can’t be bothered to run our country any more.
Guy Fawkes thought we needed a massive explosion to destroy Parliament. David Cameron’s done it with a damp squib.